BBC now urgently in need of a makeover

Perhaps one of the saddest truisms is that the BBC, so fond of producing programmes which reinvent people, homes and concepts has struggled (without much success) to give itself a significant makeover.

Today in a pretty "straight to the heart" report from the Centre for Policy Studies an insiders view of how the BBC must change is now confronting the corporation.

The BBC receives £4 Billion pounds per year to churn out pretty mediocre pap, managed by a self confessed Liberal left elite who have lost the confidence of the majority of its viewers.

The costs of running the BBC over two years could probably pay for 3 Mega Aircraft Carriers, let alone the two announced earlier in the week, that will be securing 10,000 jobs way into the future!  The expense of it is mind boggling.

The BBC has become a luxury the viewers should no longer be expected to fund to the extent it is sucking up money.  The whole country is hide bound by this inward looking corporation, a throw back to the old civil servant days, stuffed full of paper shufflers and fence sitters, ever eager to push out the latest bit of government propaganda - of whatever colour.

The following article from the Telegraph says what many of us have concluded and for the BBC the clock is most certainly ticking.  The Centre for Policy Studies and the Telegraph have kicked off a badly needed debate and one the BBC (whether it likes it or not) will have to take on board, because change is coming and swift and merciless it will have to be.

 

 

Last Updated: 1:47am BST 04/07/2008

 Credit: Telegraph

HOW TO SAVE THE BBC FROM ITSELF................

Jeff Randall argues that a combination of corporate imperialism and institutional self-regard stops the broadcaster seeing where its future lies

Few British institutions are capable of generating more storm and stress than the BBC. Find me someone who has no view at all on the corporation and I'll show you a caveman.

 
Even the BBC's director-general, Mark Thompson,
admits the licence fee is 'a tax'

Auntie's salad days are long gone, yet she remains an aphrodisiac of debate. From alleged bias and method of funding, to presenters' pay-packets and quality of output, the BBC is a reliable energiser of lacklustre dinner-parties.

The blogosphere is clogged with comment about the BBC, much of it from extremes. It doesn't matter whether postings are on the Guardian's website or The Daily Telegraph's, there is a juxtaposition of love and hateBooks, television programmes, radio documentaries, discussion pamphlets and, of course, newspaper columns are devoted to salving, scrapping, denouncing and defending the BBC.

  • Having worked there full-time for nearly five years - a period of exhilaration and exasperation in equal measure - I am now a sad junkie of all this stuff.

    advertisement

    A new dissection emerges today. Written by Sir Antony Jay, a corporation veteran and co-author of the Yes, Minister series, How To Save The BBC is published by the Centre for Policy Studies, a Right-of-centre think tank.

    The BBC's director-general, Mark Thompson, should do a bulk deal on 25,000 copies and issue it free to every member of staff. This would cost a fraction of what the BBC spends on ludicrous awaydays, while jolting thousands of jobsworths who creep about the corporation's corridors, holding meetings, dodging accountability and hoping to survive long enough to collect a pension that is funded in part by people who never watch the BBC.

    When I was its business editor, and the management was trying to crank up support for a renewed licence settlement (on even more generous terms than those left behind by Sir John Birt), I was invited to a dinner for opinion formers by the then head of Radio 4, Helen Boaden. It was attended by business luminaries, such as Sir Stuart Rose (Marks & Spencer), Allan Leighton (Royal Mail) and Sly Bailey (Trinity Mirror).

    Helen was one of the few BBC managers with whom I got on. She has a breezy charm that's not a distinguishing feature of most White City "suits". Unfortunately (for her) she assumed that I would be on-message and asked me to set out for our guests what the future of the BBC should be.

    I described a broadcaster that had been scaled back to high-quality news, current affairs and documentaries, including works of brilliance such as Blue Planet. This could be achieved, I suggested, with no more than two radio stations and two television channels - and for a much diminished fee.

    Helen winced and quickly moved round the table. I was never again asked to attend a lobbying session for taxpayers' largesse. Inside the BBC, my views are regarded as a thought-crime, somewhere between treachery and heresy, even though I am a fan who believes less would deliver more. The idea of stopping expansion, reining back and, yes, cutting costs, including jobs, is still deeply offensive to the majority of staffers who hold a quasi-religious belief in the corporation as a force for enlightenment.

    Many seem not to have noticed, or refuse to accept, that, as Jay points out: "There is no longer a case for taking £4 billion a year from the public to produce programmes they do not want or can obtain free elsewhere."

    Jay's thesis, elegantly expressed, is not that the BBC is an evil empire in need of breaking up. Far from being an abolitionist, he is keen to protect it from destruction by a combination of new technology and a growing revulsion against the £139.50 licence fee, which even Thompson admits is "a tax".

    As the BBC makes flagship programmes available online, viewers using PCs and lap-tops will not, technically, be receiving broadcasts. So why pay the licence fee? A court case to test this cannot be far away.

    At the same time, there are millions who do not share Thompson's assessment of the BBC's "civic, social and cultural benefits". In short, they don't want to fund something which they find irrelevant or worse.

    An online petition, Scrap the BBC Licence Fee, argues: "The world has moved on since the days when the BBC was central to British life… any modern government that fails to acknowledge this fact is quite simply defying the will of the people."

    One reason why the BBC cannot reform itself is the assumption, buried deep in its soul, that it is obliged to provide a total broadcasting service. Once the corporation spots a new avenue of activity, its tanks flood into the space.

    According to Jay: "Corporate gigantism and belief in a unique moral mission have made the BBC what it is today. And yet both are of vanishingly small concern to viewers and listeners." It's the high-handed moral rectitude that many outsiders find so infuriating.

    In 2003, I was fighting an internal battle to bring more balance to the BBC's coverage of immigration. I felt that some of its reporters had been programmed to promote the benefits of cultural diversity as an incontrovertible fact.

    Fed up with what he perceived to be my subversion, one of the BBC's most senior figures sent me an email: "The BBC internally is not neutral about multiculturalism. It believes in it and promotes diversity. Let's face up to that."

    I was amazed that he felt unembarrassed to put this in a formal memo. It revealed an arrogant mindset at odds with millions of his customers. Impartiality was fine, but only if it confirmed the prejudices of the BBC's editorial elite, the self-appointed custodians of liberal values.

    Jay says that in order to be rescued from itself, the BBC needs to undergo a "spiritual conversion". The corporate imperialism and institutional self-regard are a millstone. "It must seek respect not for what it is, but for what it does." This can best be achieved, he argues, by chopping out or selling off everything, except Radio 4, "a unique speech" station, and one television channel.

    Despite its official bleating, the BBC is not underfunded. By comparison with rivals, it is, as Thompson once admitted, wallowing in a "Jacuzzi of cash". The problem is that it tries to do too much, spreading its resources too thinly.

    I don't know if the very best of the BBC could be sustained were it to be cut back in line with Jay's plan, with an annual income of just £1.5 billion. But his conclusion is compelling: "The BBC's remit is to produce a volume of high-quality programmes. With much reduced output, its long tradition of producing fine programmes and a budget of £4 million a day, it should be able to achieve it triumphantly."

    Jeff Randall was the BBC's business editor, 2001-05. He is currently making a documentary series, a history of the City, for Radio Four

  •  
    Scotland's Ship Building Bonanza!

    The annoncement that the MOD are to finally get the go ahead for two new air craft carriers was much expected by Scottish workers who stand to secure 10,000 jobs at three Scottish shipyards.

    Apparently some work is coming to Portsmouth, although it is unclear exactly what benefits this monster MOD contract will contribute to the English economy, Scotland's financial gain is more clear cut they get three quarters of the work and England gets a quarter!

    With so much anger over the unfairness of the Barnett Formula, the awarding of this contract to three of Scotland's shipyards may be seen as an alternative route to direct more funds to Scotland without it being classified as part of the Barnett Formula, although most of those in England will see it for what it is, a cynical bribe to try and keep Scots voting Labour as the rest of the country turn their backs on them.

    Wouldn't it be great if England had such patriotic politicians looking after English employment interests for a change, Brown is clearly sticking to his personal commitment of ensuring the interests of the people of Scotland come first, you can't knock him for his naked nationalism, just a pity the English politicians at Westminster don't share a similar commitment for the people of England.

     

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7486683.stm

     

     
    Tories leave Smith Square to the EU

    Already covered in the newspapers, but kept rather quiet by the "would be" Eurosceptic Tories.

     

    The truth is of course the Tories have clearly got excellent relations with the EU or the swap was just a marvellous coincidence.

     

    What do you think it is most likely to be?????????

     

    Read on and be shocked, out of principle the English Democrats would have refused such a swap with such a disreputable organisation, but then again.....as the Tories have shown us MONEY TALKS and the EU have plenty of it!

     http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/06/01/do0101.xml

     

     
    Mugabe trashes Democracy...

    Will Thabo Mbeki ever find the courage to tell Robert Mugabe where to get off?.......

    Read more...
     
    Haltemprice & Howden

     PRESS RELEASE - Haltemprice & Howden By-election - English Democrats'  candidate     

    Re:  Haltemprice & Howden  By-election  The English  Democrats are pleased to announce that Joanne Robinson has  been nominated for  the forthcoming by-election in Haltemprice and  Howden,  under the slogan "Putting England First!".  Joanne was  born on 2nd February 1957 in Hull. She has been married since  1977 to the  same man!  She has 6 ‘O’ Levels.  She has a HNC in  Canine  Behaviour and Training at Bishop Burton in 2004.  After a variety of jobs,  including as a Civil  Servant, Joanne went into book-keeping specialising in petrol  stations and was a  sole proprietor from 1992 to 1998 at the Forth Service  Station on Spring  Bank.  Since then Joanne has worked  as a legal cashier,  service station manager and for the last 3 years part-time  Office Manager for an  Event Management Company.    Politically  Joanne had been a Conservative voter but she became active in  the Referendum  Party. Joanne was the UKIP Parliamentary candidate in the  General Election in  2001, when she got 945 votes. In 2003 Joanne was a UKIP  local candidate but she  became increasingly disappointed by UKIP’s leadership  failure to capitalize on  their momentum.  Joanne now thinks  that UKIP is “dead  but not yet buried”, and that it is also  insufficiently concerned about England,  so she joined the English  Democrats.  Joanne stood for the  English  Democrats in 2007 in Tranby Ward in the local elections within this  constituency  and got 544 votes (18.82%) easily beating Labour and close to the   Conservatives.    Also this year,  although there were no local elections within the  constituency, the English  Democrats stood in 4 adjoining wards, in Hull, and  beat the Conservative candidates 3  out of 4 times.     Joanne  says: “The English Democrats are offering a fresh start and reject  the cliché  ridden and spin politics of the past.  We offer the politics of a  common national identity and common  values.  Our politics are riddled  with  spin and political correctness, a vote for the English Democrats is a vote  for  honest and plain speaking”.   Joanne  says: “There should be an immediate referendum on the EU Lisbon  Treaty.  It is wholly wrong for Labour to try to  impose this Treaty on us,  contrary to their own specific manifesto commitment  that there should be a  referendum.  The people of the Republic of Ireland have said NO – WE WANT  OUR  SAY”.   Joanne  says: “There should be free residential car for the elderly, as is  available in  Scotland.  It is wrong that pensioners’ homes in  England are  being seized to pay for  this”.    Joanne  says: “We also demand access to all NHS drugs – not a “postcode  lottery”, which  means that English patients cannot receive some expensive  drugs which are freely  available in Scotland.”    Joanne  says: “There should be an end to the unjustified subsidies to other  parts of the  UK – We want a fair system for  all.”   Joanne  says: “England can no longer sustain  uncontrolled mass immigration.   It  should be stopped. It places an unacceptable strain on all our services.   All previous governments have allowed  this situation to get out of control”.  Joanne  says: “The Government should seek to protect society and not the   criminals”.   Joanne  says:  “There should be an English Parliament, with an English Prime  Minister and  Government with at least the same powers as the Scottish ones”.  Joanne also says: “The voters of Haltemprice and Howden  have the chance to  send a clear message to the government and the rest of the  stale political  Establishment that the people of England are no longer prepared to be treated as   second class citizens within the UK.  Let us put England’s  interests first”   Robin Tilbrook, Chairman of the English Democrats, said:  “I am delighted to  welcome Joanne’s nomination.  It is a clear sign of the speed with  which the  English Democrats are growing.  Even Labour’s Derek Wyatt MP a few days ago  said, at Westminster, (on the  18th June) “..I am convinced that standing still  is not an  option.  The present arrangements  are producing growing resentment  all over the United Kingdom, particularly in England..”.    Robin Tilbrook also said  that: “A vote for Joanne and the English Democrats  is a positive vote for the  people of Haltemprice and Howden.  It is a vote  for ENGLAND and for an English Parliament, First  Minister and Government for  England”.  

    For further information, or a photograph of Joanne,  contact:

    Robin Tilbrook Chairman English Democrats Quires Green, Willingale, Ongar, Essex, CM5  0QP Tel: 01277 896000 Fax: 01277 896050 Mobile: 07778  553395 www.englishdemocrats.org.uk         

     
    All happening in Henley!

    The English Democrats were out in force at Henley today, reminding the locals that they live in England, despite the fact that the local Council preferred that WE didn't!

    Was there ever a place that needed an English Democrats MP more?? 

    Henley has for too long been the preserve of Barking Boris and the Butcher's Apron ensemble.  So full of bile for dear Old England that even the local council despises the flag of St George.

    After the team were told to "remove" English bunting, for it might scare the horses, normality resumed as the Red White and Blue clogged up the high street.  Ironically the local church was sporting England's national flag, a point overlooked by the over zealous members of the Town Hall self hatred brigade.

    Oh the joy of living in a democracy, who says free speech is dead????

    When a place like Henley objects to the flying of the nation's flag you know that the rot is well and truly setting in.  Let's hope that Derek Allpass a resolute English Democrat Patriot will defend the rights of the English to be English in England and that one day the Britophiles who despise England with a terrifying degree of loathing will be cast from our midsts.  Amen to that!

    Here is a video of the day's campaigning, what great shots and to quote Darren Riley on seeing the sight of the Cross of St George fluttering in the beeze  in Henley....."Don't it look great!"

    Well done to all those who took Saturday out of their own free time to defend England and her right to equality -respect and thanks to the whole team.

     

    ENJOY!!  

     

     
    Lisbon Treaty Ratified by Lords

    Things may seem bad, but however bad it seems, be sure that the situation is even worse.

     

    The European Union is toxic to democracy and to fair dealing.  An animal is never so dangerous then when it is lying wounded.  This is true of the tyrant Mugabe and it is certainly true of the Political Elite running the EU.

    With our money and with our power the cabal of Europhile politicians will be ignoring their own rules about unanimous Treaty ratification, and will seek to ballet dance their way through rejected a Constitution and now a rejected Treaty with a mixture of arrogance,  indifference and public contempt.

    To the Euro politicians the public are an unwashed ignorant mass, the usual perception of  a dictatorship, ours is not to reason why ours is to do or die.  Well, the peoples of Europe refuse to accept this.

    IF as we expect the politicians of Europe are determined to bulldoze this Treaty through, knowing that the people don't want it then the people have two choices.  They either seek through democratic means to change the people at the top, or through a process of mass civil disobedience reject EU interference in their daily lives by refusing to accept the legitimacy of the EU.

    Last night in the House of Lords the vote to ratify the Lisbon Treaty was passed.  Shockingly the margin in favour was quite high.  We understand from a peer at the proceedings that one of the reasons it was quite high, is that a good number of Conservative peers were actually at Ascot and as such were unable to vote!

    This is a scandalous state of affairs if it is true.  That the future of our national sovereignty was decided by a large number of unelected people in the Lords, a proportion of which never even bothered to turn up to vote on this momentous measure because they were too busy placing a bet on the horses.

    That, is the quality and startling conclusion the electorate have to draw from the pantomime in the House of Lords.  It is really a disgraceful betrayal of the nation and our democracy if that revelation were true.

    Another reason to elect the Lords if one needed one!

    Latest from the Guardian Newspaper............. 

    France is pressing European leaders to set a deadline today for a plan of action to salvage the EU's grand reform project rejected by Irish voters.

    But President Nicolas Sarkozy's plan to find a way out of Europe's crisis of confidence by October has run into resistance, not least from Ireland, which rejected the EU's Treaty of Lisbon by referendum.

    Desperate to find a way of resurrecting their blueprint for Europe's direction, EU leaders meet in Brussels today. They hope that Brian Cowen, the Irish prime minister, can offer suggestions on a way out of the impasse.

    Despite the French push for an October deadline, however, Cowen warned yesterday that he would not be rushed. "I will impress upon them the need to avoid prejudicing the process which we must now undertake in Ireland," he told parliament in Dublin. Cowen said he hoped the rest of the EU would "accord us the time we need to play our part in understanding last week's vote".

    Exactly a week after Irish voters said no to the Lisbon treaty, which from next January was supposed to reform the EU's institutions and redefine how decisions are taken, the summit will try to chart a way forward.

    Slovenia, chairing today's summit, predicted there would be no repeat of the European crisis that followed the French and Dutch referendum defeats of a European constitution three years ago. European leaders appear determined not to administer the last rites to the treaty, despite the Irish rebuff.

    France is seeking to set a deadline of an October summit for a plan to revive the treaty and is also said to be furious with the European commission, blaming its chief, José Manuel Barroso, for failing to make the EU more popular with voters.

    "This summit could get nasty," said a senior source in Brussels. "There's an anti-Barroso campaign out of Paris."

    Germany would also like a swift agreement on what to do next, with the favoured option being that Ireland, in return for some declaratory concessions, should stage a referendum rerun, perhaps next spring. Concessions might include assurance that Ireland would always have a European commissioner, for example, as well as declarations on the sanctity of Ireland's abortion ban, military neutrality, and sovereignty over taxation rates.

    But Cowen, according to sources in Dublin, will tell his European partners that at this stage his government cannot countenance a second referendum.

    "One of the main goals will be to calm the Europeans down and not inflame the situation either in the EU or back at home any further," said an Irish government source. "It will be made clear to the EU partners that it is politically impossible for Ireland to have a rerun."

    Cowen is to outline his options and to offer an analysis of the Irish rejection at a Brussels dinner this evening. It is probably too early for any clear strategy to emerge.

    Officials and diplomats in Brussels are drawing analogies with Denmark in 1992 after the Danes, in a referendum, rejected the Treaty of Maastricht and then voted for the treaty in a new plebiscite after being granted exemptions from the treaty's provisions.

    The Irish resistance to the pressure is being bolstered by Britain and others. Dublin sources said that Cowen was "very happy" with the British position following his talks with Gordon Brown in Belfast on Monday. Brown is expected to discuss the options with Sarkozy in Paris today before the Brussels summit.

    The French and the Germans also want assurances that ratification of the Lisbon treaty by all other 26 EU states will be accomplished as quickly as possible. Following Britain's ratification last night, another seven countries have still to endorse the treaty.

     
    Waterloo Day Today

    Today is Waterloo Day.  Do we know enough about it?  Should we care?

    English Democrats would argue we should care, because if we don't know or understand the mistakes of the past we are doomed to repeat them in the future.

    A war is not a particular point for celebration, but it is probably a useful opportunity for reflection and perhaps if we spent a bit more time reflecting on warfare and its devastating effects, we might be less inclined to get involved in other military adventures.

    Here is information about the battle of Waterloo, enjoy!

    The Battle of Waterloo, fought near the town of Waterloo (pronounced [watəʀˈloː]) in Belgium on Sunday 18 June 1815,[5] was the decisive battle of the Waterloo Campaign, and Napoleon Bonaparte's last. Waterloo marked the end of the period known as the Hundred Days, which began in March 1815 after Napoleon's return from Elba, where he had been exiled after his defeats at the Battle of Leipzig in 1813 and the campaigns of 1814 in France. The defeat put a final end to Napoleon's rule as Emperor of the French.

    After Napoleon returned to power in 1815, many states which had previously resisted his rule formed the Seventh Coalition and began to mobilise armies to oppose him. The first two assembled close to the French north eastern border. They consisted of a Prussian army under the command of Gebhard von Blücher, and an Anglo-allied army under the command of the Duke of Wellington. Napoleon chose to attack in the hope of destroying them before they, with other members of the Seventh Coalition, could join in a coordinated invasion of France. The campaign consisted of four major battles: Quatre Bras (16 June), Ligny (16 June), Waterloo (18 June), and Wavre (18 June19 June). According to the Duke of Wellington, the battle was "The nearest-run thing you ever saw in your life.[6]

    It rained heavily overnight on 17 June, so Napoleon delayed giving battle until noon on 18 June to allow the ground to dry. Wellington's army, positioned across the Brussels road on the Mont St Jean escarpment, withstood repeated attacks by the French, until in the evening when they counter-attacked and drove the French from the field. Simultaneously the Prussians arrived in force and broke through Napoleon's right flank. Finally, the French army left the battlefield in disorder, allowing Coalition forces to enter France and restore Louis XVIII to the French throne. Napoleon abdicated to the British and was exiled to Saint Helena, where he died in 1821.

    The battlefield is in present-day Belgium, about eight miles (12 km) SSE of Brussels, and about a mile (2 km) from the town of Waterloo. The site of the battlefield is today dominated by a large mound of earth, the Lion's Hillock. As this mound used earth from the field itself, the original topography has not been preserved.

     

     

     
    Scotland Budget Method "PERVERSE"!

    A GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE STATES THE OBVIOUS MUCH TO THE DELIGHT OF THE

    ENGLISH MOVEMENT WHO HAVE BEEN ARGUING THE POINT FOR 10 YEARS

    NOW, FINALLY THE SCOTTISH RAJ GET THE MESSAGE - QUESTION IS DO THEY CARE?  

    "PERVERSE" Barnett Formula 

    Scottish bank money
    Scotland's Treasury money is worked out from the Barnett Formula

    The process which decides the level of cash Scotland gets from the Treasury is perverse and not efficient, a public spending expert has said.

    Oxford University's Professor Iain McLean told MSPs the Barnett Formula was unsustainable in the long run.

    His claim that Scotland was ready to look after its own taxes was welcomed by the SNP and Liberal Democrats.

    The comments came as Holyrood's finance committee heard evidence from academic figures on the budget process.

    Prof McLean, a public spending expert, is currently advising the Calman Commission review on devolution.

    He told the committee inquiry: "I think you have excellently designed institutions for the budget process in an independent state, or a state with substantial fiscal autonomy.

    Prof McLean's evidence points to one of devolution's fundamental flaws
    Joe FitzPatrick
    SNP MSP

    "Of course what we have is neither of those."

    Prof McLean's submission to the inquiry stated: "Barnett is unsustainable in the long-run. It is neither efficient nor equitable."

    He continued: "It gives perverse incentives to the devolved administrations - their block grant is a function of a number they cannot control.

    "In turn, their decisions have consequences which the UK government cannot fully control."

    Stating public spending was higher per head in Scotland, Northern Ireland and London, Prof McLean, of Oxford's Nuffield College, said: "It probably derives not from greater need but from the more credible threat to the Union of the United Kingdom that they pose."

    Labour MSP Elaine Murray said members of the public would never get interested as long as MSPs were forced to "shuffle the cards" dealt by Westminster.

    Budget confusion

    And after the committee meeting, Nationalist MSP, Joe FitzPatrick, said: "Prof McLean's evidence points to one of devolution's fundamental flaws - that we are spending money without direct responsibility for raising it."

    Liberal Democrat finance spokesman, Liam McArthur, said the Barnett Formula provided stability during the early years of the Scottish Parliament, but added: "It is time to look again at how we fund our policy priorities."

    The UK Government has said Scotland's share of public spending provided the same per capita spending increase as comparable government departments in England.

    It added that Scotland also benefited "substantially" from the UK's continued strong economic growth and employment performance.

    Edinburgh University professor, Irvine Lapsley, also told the committee there was "much to be proud" at the Scottish Parliament but Jo Armstrong, of the Centre of Public Policy for Regions, warned the budget process in Scotland was not fully understood.

     
    Eire rejects Lisbon Treaty

    Early indications are that the NO vote is likely to win by a rate of 60/40%.

    Results gathered in Dublin are already showing that the NO vote is in the lead and is likely to triumph.

    Full results will be out later today, but a 40% turnout often favours a negative vote.

    It is clear that the people of Eire have spoken for the majority of Europe who have been denied a voice and the fact that the country who has gained most from EU membership sees fit to reject the Treaty is a significant kick in the teeth to the European Elite who (wrongly) believed that financial bribery of Eire would deliver their loyalty.

    As the English have also found to their cost, the Irish consider what is in their interests first and foremost and that is certainly the approach the English should also pursue.

    Eire have had their industries boosted and their livelihoods lifted by billions of pounds of largely English money syphoned away via the EU into Eire, but the Irish can also see the price for staying in the EU is far too high.

    Majority voting, loss of sovereignty, loss of neutrality, loss of subsidies and control over virtually every aspect of their lives is not something they relish, nor should they.

    It is now time that the rogue government of Gordon Brown were also forced to honour their commitment to provide a vote on this important constitutional matter. 

    Do we want our views represented by an EU President no one has voted for?  Do we want our foreign policy dictated to us by a bunch of cowardly states who have failed to support us in Afghanistan? Do we want our views obscured by majority voting? Do we want our sovereignty to be cast to the winds? NO NO NO NO

    England demands a vote on the Lisbon Treaty NOW!!!!!!!!!!

     

     

     
    BBC Report confirms devolution coverage is poor

    The BBC have been told in no uncertain terms that they are not doing a good job of covering devolved politics in the UK.  They are not alone of course, hundreds of thousands have been telling them that for the last ten years, but have just been given the usual brush off which is part and parcel of the arrogance of that British institution.

    Many a Scot has had a quick intake of breath with the prospect of having to pay £3,000pa for their children to go to university, catching the BBC announcing that this "new" national policy in fact only applies to the people of England (relax) only the idiots South of the border will have to cough up, the rest of the UK can continue to have it free.  The BBC is either cynical or ignorant in keeping these facts from the listeners and viewers as it seeks to hide the scandalous mistreatment of the people of England when compared to other parts of the UK.

    Should we be surprised at the BBC's ignorance?  Afterall, politics is such a minority topic at the Beeb, competing with garden makeovers, talent shows and Dr Who revamps, means serious debates about trivial matters such as the future of England, availability of life saving drugs and falling education standards are simply a frustration to the intellects of the Beeb, who would prefer to hear it first hand from John Penaar or the twit Nick Robinson, both self styled political correspondents who impertinently assume they have an opinion worth hearing!

    The BBC Trust, filled with QUANGOITES and Labour luvvies goes through the motions, but even they can't fool all the people all of the time.  10 years on the Beeb has been nailed for being inadequate on virtually every aspect of devolution coverage.  Remiss to ignore English Culture, remiss to avoid English politics, erroneous in its reporting of "national" politics and incompetent in its understanding of devolution.

    Will anything change?  Has a report ever really made a difference?  Well, we can all draw our own conclusions.

    If you would like to see the report and read its conclusions please follow the link.  However, it is highly likely that the Beeb will continue to misinform, misrepresent and confuse the issues, because, in the end it is the British Broadcasting Corporation and with its onerous Charter, political correctness and horror of free speech we can be confident absolutely nothing will change.  Sadly, the BBC has to go and a major reason it must go is contained in the latest BBC Trust Report - it is unchangeable.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/news/press_releases/2008/network_news.html

     
    Eire could save Europe today by voting "NO"

    The Europhiles are holding their breath, will Eire cast the death blow to the Lisbon Treaty in today's referendum?

    Could we find in the space of two days that the Northern Irish DUP steal our Civil Liberties in a disgusting pact with Labour only to find the South of Ireland free us from the nightmare that is the looming authoritarian superstate of the EU?  What a pivotal and suprisingly powerful turnaround for the people of Ireland!

    Knowing the disgraceful betrayal of civil liberties the DUP in Northern Ireland have perpetrated against freedom, can we now hope that the people of Southern Ireland will make a decisive blow against those who would continue to salami slice away our freedoms and ability to govern ourselves?

    Today the people of the UK look to Southern Ireland to exercise their democratic right to REFUSE to pass across their national sovereignty.  As a small country Eire stands to lose the most in terms of majority voting and influence.  The Lisbon Treaty will ensure that small countries are whipped into line and their peoples' voices are muted.  For Eire this is probably the last time they will ever have a decisive vote on anything.  NOW is the time to make their vote count, NOW is the time to say NO to an undemocratic Europe, and NO to those politicians who deny their people the right to a referendum.

    Eire, we hope today you will do the right thing and say NO to the Lisbon Treaty, by doing so you give the UK the possibility to fight Labour's refusal to honour their commitment to a Referendum and you force the slippery Conservatives to keep open THEIR promise to allow the nation a vote.  Don't let the Tories off the hook, vote for Neutrality, Freedom and Democracy, VOTE NO in the Referendum.

     http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1213183928.98

     
    9 Irish DUP MPS sell out England's Freedom

    It was quite a disgusting sight to witness, the 9 DUP MPs making the decisive votes to  dispense with Habeas Corpus for political favours inevitably linked to money from the English Exchequer.

    The Labour and Tory Parties use as their defence against proportional representation the fear that "unrepresentative" minorities can have a disproportionate influence over policy.  Tell us, what is the difference between 9 DUP MPs holding sway over 50 Million English people, 5 million Scots and 3 Million Welsh?  If that is not an abuse of our political system then we really do not know what is.  Our dysfunctional Parliamentary system allows matters of Constitutional importance to be sealed on a single vote - don't tell the English that what we need is a written Constitution, with an authoritarian rogue government at the helm we are at the mercy of madmen.

    The disgraceful abuse of power under Labour should confirm in the minds of the public that we are indeed being run by a rogue government, aided and abetted by gold digging hangers on festering in Northern Ireland.  What weasle excuses will those discreditable DUP MPs give for their betrayal of our freedoms, how many pieces of silver have they sold us out for?  England must have her own Parliament to be free of those who would abuse us.  Gordon Brown is a disgrace to his office and those in the Labour party that support his abominable assault on our liberties deserve to be cast from Parliament.

    We salute those principalled Labour MPs who withstood the pressure placed on them by the whips and voted on the side of justice fairness and equality.     There is no demand and no need for 42 days, there are plenty of other ways terrorists could be held under lock and key without throwing out our civil liberties.

    England will not forgive this betrayal.  We have been kicked in the teeth by the Scots, had our freedoms stolen from us by the Irish, we now wait with bated breathe to see what treasonous behaviour the Welsh will exact given the opportunity.

    Today is a dark historic day, the Tories will no doubt forget to retract this poisonous piece of legislation should they come to office and the English will rue the day they ever voted Labour into power.  England now faces the ire of the civilised world with draconian custody legislation which is commonplace in some of the darkest recesses of the most despotic regimes on the planet.  Thank you Labour, now we know what you mean by JUSTICE FAIRNESS EQUALITY.

    RIP Habeas Corpus

     
    Labour has spent just £116 on celebrating St George's Day

    We shouldn't be surprised, but it has emerged that over the last few years Labour has spent derisory amounts on celebrating England's National Day.

    Andrew Rossindale MP one of the few patriotic English MPs in Parliament was shocked to learn that Margaret Hodge's Department spent just £116 on St George's Day this year!  This is a scandal when compared to the amount of money that has been spent by public bodies allowing the celebration of minority celebrations up and down the country.

    Further evidence (if it were needed) that the cultural life of the English is under attack.  If it isn't alien cultures asserting their right to celebrate who and what they are, then the all pervasive British State operating out of Westminster seeks to stifle any expression of Englishness.

    The Labour government should be ashamed of itself in its brazen attempts to subjugate Englishness by sheer neglect and indifference.  It is clear, with the millions spent on promoting Welshness, Scottishness, Irishness that Labour's social engineering has been nothing more than a cynical programme to deculturalise the people of England and pour scorn on the wishes, sentiments and human rights of many millions of people who consider themselves to be English.

    Labour must go and the Conservatives need to get real about the cultural needs of England and more Britishness is most certainly not the solution!

    Read the disgraceful truth at the following link:

     http://uk.news.yahoo.com:80/afp/20080610/tpl-lifestyle-britain-culture-politics-o-5b839a9.html

     
    English Lobby call on Parliament to reject 42 Days

    THE ENGLISH LOBBY APPEAL TO PARLIAMENT TO REJECT 42 DAYS

     

     

    Dear Parliamentarian, 

     

    The Labour Party have less than 22% of the popular vote, they do not speak for the vast majority of the UK population and certainly not for the people of England. The vote to extend 42 Days detention on people who are “suspected” of involvement in terrorist activities is an unacceptable infringement of our English rights to Habeas Corpus and an unprecedented interference by politicians into the functioning of the judicial system. 

     

    Passing this Bill into law will make the UK an outcast in the civilized world and will betray the hard one freedoms of our people who gave their lives to keep England free from authoritarianism. 

     

    ·        MI5 have said they don’t need it

    ·        Leading Police Constables have said it is not needed

    ·        Past Attorney General’s reject the need for it

    ·        The Home Secretary can’t even justify a case for it 

     

    Elected members have a duty to respect our ancient and hard won civil liberties and 42 days will break the trust between politicians and the People, it will be a grave day should this happen. 

     

    The English Lobby, part of the wider English movement ask that you think very carefully about the importance of Liberty to the English psyche and reject Brown’s plans to incarcerate innocent people for 42 days without charge.  

    If you pass this law we will be no better than a banana republic such as Zimbabwe and our moral authority to speak on matters of liberty across the world will vanish.

     

     Please do the right thing and vote NO to 42 days.

    Both the Commons and the Lords have received this request

     
    Labour's failed English Education

    10 years on the "education education education" mantra, uttered by Blair is sounding hollow and empty.

    Billions having been spent on educational establishments that still leave nearly 650 schools unable to achieve a 30% attainment for their pupils to achieve A-C grades at GCSE.  Or perhaps we should say a 70% failure rate?

    Hundreds of thousands of children will have their futures blighted because the schools these children are attending are simply not up to the job.

    Yes, it is right not to "blame" teachers for the state of society, but the children in these "failing schools" spend  7 hours a day 5 days a week and more than 10 years of their life at school, and if schools after this time cannot get more than 70% of their pupils to achieve not even an average C pass from their end of studies examinations there is something very very wrong with the system.

    Many mourn the passing of grammar schools, a fantastic opportunity for many working class children to go on to a first class education, freed from the need to pay, and opportunities given on merit and merit alone, not limited by some childish preoccupation with limiting choice for those with ability.  This system was seen as unpalatable to the Champagne Socialist like of Diane Abbot and Co, who castigated such schools as "elitest and exclusive", and advocated their closure.  Incidentally Abbot and a good number of other good "socialists" simply sent their children to a private school as they couldn't bear to waste their educational futures in the state sector.

    The decimation of the excellent grammar school system and replacement with mediocre "comprehensives", where children are treated as nothing more than statistics in the sausage machine mill of the education sector has been a typically disasterous move by the dogma obsessed Labourites.

    State schools are now spending as much (or more) to educate children as the private sector, but the private sector has stupendously different results, typically the achievement rates of A-C grades are above 70% and regularly 90%+ as against figures of 25-60%.

    Serious questions now have to be asked about comprehensive education.  Does it have a future? If so, who should be condemned to it?

    Everywhere we look standards are falling.  The sciences are falling away replaced with "soft" subject such as the ubiquitous "media studies".  Yet more children then ever leave school unable to spell and add up, despite the investment and despite the alleged "improvements" Labour would have us believe.

    Shocking numbers of comprehensively educated children are also dropping out of university, often because they can't cope with the work, or never wanted to go to university in the first place, being pushed there by a Labour party that ignored the debt and pressures such children would face.  Labour crucified working class children with top up fees and expectations which were simply unrealistic.

    The truth is education is in a mess.  It was in a mess before Labour got into power and it is in even more of a mess now they are about to leave office.  The mess they have left this time will have a generational impact.  Undereducated children, with low aspirations and a sense of failure will breed the next generation who themselves could be faced with a similar future.

    The secondary education system is, like most of the public service infrastructure  "not fit for purpose".

    We need to go back to the drawing board and the clue to our salvation is the creation of a new accessible form of grammar school, a move away from large dysfunctional comprehensives, and a focus on small schools, with excellent teachers, strong and uncompromising discipline and the removal of children who are disruptive and in need of special educational needs into establishments which are designed to cater for such needs and deal with children who have difficulties learning, behaving and interracting.

    Our society should aim for excellence, not aim for mediocrity.  Under Labour all we have had is a dumbing down of everything from culture to education, social behaviour to family life.  What a devastating 10 years of failure Labour has brought England and what a project it will be to try and put things right. 

    All we can say to Ed Balls (the latest hapless incumbent at the newly manufacturerd department he is now heading up) and his "solutions" to these problems is ........ you guessed it!

    http://education.guardian.co.uk/schools/story/0,,2284681,00.html

     
    42 Days confidence vote on Brown

    Whether he is imposing higher taxes on the lowest paid, congestion charges on people who can no longer afford to drive, or punishing motorists by charging such high taxes on petrol many people can no longer afford to fill up, Brown's zest for suicidal policies  sees no limit.

    Already on very shaky ground politically, he presses on with "his" agenda, which already builds on the stifling authoritarian nanny state he and Blair together created, and now is determined to drive through his latest mad idea of locking up suspects for 42 days.

    English Democrats are definitely not soft on crime, but throwing people into gaol without a shred of evidence against them is not something we should be suckered into. 

    Brown "takes comfort" in believing that the public support his mad capped scheme, well, it is a very risky politician that creates policy on the back of one or two popular newspaper surveys, but then again this government have been wedded to "knee jerk" legislation, one of the reasons everything is in such a mess.

    The coming vote on 42 days will be Brown's swan song.  If he wins he will be condemned by the rest of the civilised world and every right thinking person as the person who stripped habeus corpus from the backs of the people of England.  If he loses he will be seen as the weak, ineffectual and incompetent politician we know him to be.

    Why the man persisted with this suicidal position goodness only knows, but he is fast becoming a minority of one and those MPs that vote to support 42 days will be condemned (along with their ridiculous leader) and will prove to the public (if it were needed) that some MPs will vote for anything if it saves their political neck.

    Let's see who the real guardians of freedom and liberty are at the coming vote and see the cowards who have kept this moral free government in power with just 22% of the popular vote.

    NO to 42 days, if there is evidence then people can be held on remand in the normal way, 42 days without evidence is not only a step too far, it is a disgusting assault on hard one freedoms imposed by a minority rogue government.  Shame on them

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/jun/09/terrorism.justice

     
    Cameron already ratting on Referendum

    So you think we can trust the Conservatives and slick Cameron?

    Think again.

    Already he is warming up the public for ratting on any subsequent vote on the Lisbon Treaty, once he has seen it into law he has NO intention of opening that can of worms up.  Blame it on Labour he will, but be sure this was a stitch up both parties are involved with and the saps are the people of England who will be sacrificed to their personal greed.

    This is the latest revelation from Cameron.....

    Cameron: once Lisbon Treaty is law, a referendum will be "almost impossible"

    The Sun reports that David Cameron yesterday said it would be "almost impossible" to have a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty if it was already law in the UK and the rest of the EU. The Conservative leader told an audience in Harlow, Essex: "We may have to say, well look, we're not happy with this situation, here are some of the powers we'd like to have back. But we can't give you that referendum on the Lisbon Treaty because it's already been put in place across the rest of Europe."


    Well, there you have it.  Tories never had any intention of behaving honourably in the same way Cameron has no intention of addressing the English Democratic deficit.

    Cameron simply wants the Scottish grip on England to remain and to hell with the consequences.

    Conservatives can't be trusted, niether can Labour and the Liberal Democrats are a joke - we only have the English Democrats who will defend England's democratic values - we need your help more than ever if we are to triumph over those who would abuse us.

     
    Tsvangirai the brave

    Today we learn that aid agencies have been told to stop their interventions to save the starving and distressed of that ravaged country.  The main reason of course is so that there will be no witnesses to the brazen intimidation and brutality that the Marxist madman Mugabe wishes to inflict on his own country.

    Unable to come to terms with the fact that he is not wanted by the people of ZImbabwe the maniac is now setting about trying to kill or intimidate people into voting for him.  Starve or be beaten, will be the stark choices the people of Zimbabwe will be given.

    Colonial British rule may well have been an uncomfortable psychological concession made by that country, but at least in colonial times that nation could feed itself and build its economy to one of the most successful in Africa. Now what has self rule brought them?  Was colonialism really worse than what they now have?? 

    Black majority rule in Zimbabwe has followed the dismal record of black majority rule in South Africa, where the rule of law, democracy and common sense has been substituted for tribalism, corruption,dictatorship and economic failure.

    It does say alot about the West's failing mission to democratise the world, sometimes democracy is simply too advanced a concept, with too shallow an origin for many unsophisticated societies to grapple with it, indeed democracy in the west is a pretty shakey, in the case of the EU (as a case in point) democracy is falling away to be replaced with authoritarianism, so really, can we sit and scoff at Africa's failed dalliances with the concept?

    One could say this is the price of consulting the electorate, their apathy spawning the political elites that run the world with little concern or thought for the people they are supposed to be serving.  However, it is more likely that the poor quality of our education systems are producing people who go into politics, many of whom simply have no idea about the real world coupled with an absence of management skills and a patchy CV of personal achievements.  Afterall, people like Blair had managed nothing of significance before he was given the country to run!  We have a nack of creating our own misery!

    The MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai is nothing less than a Saint and should be awarded the highest international plaudits for his tireless defence of his people in the face of the most disgusting and bestial behaviour of the Mugabe regime.  Tsvangarai is a very special person, for he is a rare example of a selfless politician, because the vast majority of "would be" politicians would never put their life on the line for their country.

    Tsvangarai is nothing less than a modern day Mandela, in fact even more impressive than Mandela for his tenacity and sheer refusal to be beaten into silence and to daily put his life at risk to make a point.  He stands for the decent commonplace Zimbabwean, he stands for truth and hope, he stands for a brighter day and he deserves everything the civilised world can do to help his beleaguered nation.

    Where is the international aid?  The condemnation?  Why does the President of South Africa so scornful of apartheid, sit silent when genocide is happening only next door?  Where are the African Statesmen standing up objecting to the obliteration of Zimbabwe?  Africa will be rightly judged by what happens in Zimbabwe and rightly condemned if Tsvangirai, a decent, brave and courageous man is bludgeoned to death because a madman refused to accept that the people have spoken.

    The English Democrats send heartfelt Best Wishes to this brave Democrat and we extend our hand of friendship to the Zimbabwean people in their hour of need.  Come the hour, come the man, Tsvangirai is that man and we will be watching his progress intently, woebetide Mugabe or his henchman if they harm him.

      

     
    Cane EIRE Save Europe on June 12th?

    As amazing as it seems, Eire is the only country in Europe that will actually be permitting its people to have a Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.  That vote will be on the 12th JUNE 2008.

    Eire is the only honourable exception to the craven capitulation of the political elites to the advent of a new Authoritarian European Age. 

    Barely 60 years after the second world war, we now find ourselves facing a new and sinister threat to our freedoms, cloaked in the guise of the "European Family" the EU has emerged as a largely unwanted, undemocratic, authoritarian, bureaucratically driven monolith, preaching the same failed policies of central planning and micromanagement that ruined Russia.  Infested with the same problems of corruption, incompetence and self interest it purports to reject, it is the new menace now facing Europe.

    What are people like Kenneth Clarke and John Gummer thinking of, when they throw their heart and soul into dragging the UK into a European Union that has proved it is incapable of managing itself, let alone the continent of Europe?  Labour are beyond help on Europe, their grasping ex leader would love nothing more than to land the top job as President of Europe, and no doubt his wife would welcome the extra money! 

    What pygmies of political intellect can seriously sell the EU project as anything other than a naked attempt of political elites to grab more power to themselves then give it away to the notoriously incompetent civil service not only in Brussels but the spawning "regional" off shoots littering Europe and infesting our everyday lives with the promise of an Orwellian future, where the working man becomes a slave to the government machine?

    Eire has the chance to change all of this by saying the single word that every other leading country in Europe has not had the chance or courage to say........ "NO"!!!

    "NO" is not a negative decision, it is a right decision, it is the only decision if these cowards, traitors and charlatans are not to ruin a great continent and turn it from lively, vibrant, culture rich national entities into a grey, drab, culturefree zone.

    The English Democrats sincerely hope that the people of Eire will do the right thing for the continent and vote honourably by voting "NO" on June 12th.  Only that way does Europe stand a chance of fighting against the disgusting lack of democracy the whole Constitutional business has exposed.

    Brussels and the EU is not fit to govern anything, it is unwanted, unneeded and incapable of running a continent. The EU is nothing more than the EUSSR, and do we really want to live under the cosh of yet another incompetent elite?

    VOTE "NO" ON 12th JUNE, SAVE EUROPE FROM ITSELF

    Why worker exploitation lies at the heart of a democracy free Europe:  

       http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=tjTpUE58Exo

     
    42 Days to hell

    The Home Secretary Jackie Smith has been rocketing around the prawn sandwich circuit strong arming the obsequious MPs of the Labour party reminding them that unemployment awaits should Brown lose his daft Bill pushing through 42 days to incarcerate people without charge.

    True to form the moral free anti Liberal "progressives" cluttering up the benches at Westminster, will vote in their own interests and to hell with civil rights and natural justice, let alone the Magna Carta and Habeus Corpus.  Once again we will find more precious freedoms consigned to the dustbin marked "Labour Authoritarianism" - or should we say Marxist Authoritarianism? 

    Only a few weeks away from waking up to find ourselves in Gordon's Gulag, the BBC  apologist for the bizarre behaviour of Labour is still silent in criticism and unable to even sponsor a good documentary on the relentless erosion of basic freedoms. 

    Curious how Brown believes he can incarcerate people without trial, yet known terrorists have to be let free to live amongst us even when they are not even British Citizens, their lifestyles paid for out of the public purse and their ballooning families educated by our taxpayers!  Labour are really an embarrassment to common sense.

    Is there a case for 42 days?  Well you won't find one, the intellectually challenged Ms. Smith on BBC Radio Five Live (earlier this week) made the breathtaking statement that there was no example she could give to justify the need for this change in the law, however, we "might" need it at some time in the future, therefore we should ensure we have it should we need it!  Bizarre but true.   

    We all know where Labour's laws end up...don't we?  The poor devil ejected from a Labour conference under the terrorism act simply because he begged to differ from the SPIN on the platform!  The Nat West Bankers swiftly extradited to the USA on fraud charges using fast track terrorism suspect legislation so the authorities could circumvent proper judicial procedures in a non terrorism case.  The woman arrested for reading out the dead soldiers in Iraq outside Parliament, a security risk...... what on Earth will Gordon use 42 days incarceration for?

    Perhaps he is thinking of locking Cameron up Mugabe style during the campaigning period of the next election in a pathetic attempt to pretend he doesn't exist? Or maybe he would use it to threaten and intimidate people into submission?  Either way, Gordon's Gulag is about to be created and the digraceful rabble at Westminster will be going through the lobbies voting YES, because, in the end, what is more important to them isn't liberty, freedoms, and justice, but jobs for the boys, pensions and the Westminster trough.

    Go on Labour, show us what you are made of and your true colours, because sure as hell you won't be getting a chance for another few decades!

     http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article4069036.ece

     
    Straw the bore

    People are now recognising that the Tartan Raj need pruning and contrary to those who suggest the English don't like Brown because he is Scottish, that is most certainly NOT the issue.

    As we in the English Democrats have reiterated many times, we would support a Martian if that person had been elected to office by the people of the country they sought to represent.  Brown, who may well be a Martian for all he knows or cares about matters English receives our approbrium not for his Scottishness but for his lack of a mandate to assume the role of First Minister for England.

    Brown's Scottishness is an irrelevance and well the Labour party know it, but to have Brown as England's First Minister without one English person having voted for him, is the kind of outrage the Scots would not have put up with had we tried to shoe -horned Jack Straw into the role of First Minister of Scotland without a vote!  We now live in a devolved world, would that the Tories and Labour recognise it!

    As usual Labour are talking rubbish, trying to confuse Brown's Scottishness with their black propaganda that somehow the English now hate Scots.  Granted the Scots at Westminster have done nothing to endear themselves to the English, but our disgust is reserved for their lack of democracy and incompetence rather than anything else.

    Jack Straw, a rather pathetic sight these days has the dubious honour of being touted as the next Labour Leader, well, we can only hope that the party select him, because this man of straw will be leading a party of straw and we can all hope he finds his way to the compost heap as quickly as possible!

     http://news.scotsman.com/latestnews/No-need-to-purge-Cabinet.4140399.jp

     

     
    IATA award CAA Wooden Spoon

    10 years of QUANGOMANIA was rewarded with the UK Civil Aviation Authority being named as the worst international regulatory authority by IATA the Air Travel Association at a recent wooden spoon award!

    It would be hilarious if the implication of this award was not so serious.  It does make a rather dismal comment on the largely ineffectual result of unaccountable regulators infesting every aspect of public life here in the UK.

    If a quango can screw up something as important as aviation management there isn't much left that couldn't be just as easily wrecked.  The Northern Rock, Equitable Life and various Pensions scandals would also make the FSA yet another unaccountable QUANGO fit for most incompetent award, clearly this is an area of accomplishment the UK should not wish to excel in! 

    Accountable Monopoly state ownership has been replaced by unaccountable Monopoly State ownership as everything from our electricity, water, education system, genetics, transport, and practically anything worth regulating has been turned from outright management by the state to shadowy quangos.

    A trail of  scandals and incompetences are a regular feature of these QUANGOs, that continue to spend billions without any apparent accountability , yet everywhere they touch they seem to make the situation worse not better.

    Competition is driven out, the wrong doers are vindicated and those that complain are treated with contempt.

    Why has the UK, one of the most restrictive media markets in the world?  Whatever happened to citizen's broadcasting? Whatever happened to choice?

    Why do Sainsbury's and Tesco's dominate everything when choice in the marketplace is supposed to be the watchword?

    Well done IATA for pointing out the obvious.  QUANGOS are bad for England, bad for democracy and bad for customer service, it is now time we called time on them, the Civil Aviation Authority is an expensive joke and should be disbanded along with the legions of paper pushers who fail to deliver.

    http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30400-1317835,00.html?f=rss

     
    Too many Scots MPs warn Brown..

    Labour MPs have warned Gordon Brown to ditch his Scots cabinet colleagues in favour of English ones...

    Read more...
     
    Gordon Brown must answer English Question

    At some stage — perhaps very soon — the English Question will explode into British politics, and will decisively change the political landscape........

    Read more...
     
    The future is Plutonium...
    Question: What do Sellafield, Hinkley Point, Sizewell, Dungeness and Bradwell all have in common?
    Read more...
     
    St George's flag - not guilty.

    Another day, another innocent Englishman charged with inciting racist hatred because he has the flag of St George displayed... He was threatened with a fine of thirty quid unless he took it down. The Officer in charge told him that to display it was to insult the ethnic minorities of England....

    Let's get this straight - OUR flag is not racist / insulting / right wing / fascist / elitist or any other 'ist' you want to talk about. It is the flag of England..... geddit?

    Read more...
     
    The State of Englishness...

    Read this and weep....

    This article is from the Brussels Journal and gives an appraisal of the English in 2008. I wonder if Gordon Brown has read it?

    Read more...
     
    Labour finished as a viable party

    Crewe and Nantwich will be seen as the watershed that shows the future for the Labour party.

    The disgusting abuse of the people of England, the stealing of pensions, the punitive taxation, the naked anti Englishness from a Scottish dominated cabal of Scotland's political rejects is now on an inexorable trajectory to oblivion.

    Well done Crewe and Nantwich, you may have elected a Conservative out of desperation, but the message is loud and clear, England is saying goodbye to Labour.

    Here are the results:  

    • Edward Timpson (Con) 20,539 (49.49%, +16.93%)
    • Tamsin Dunwoody (Lab) 12,679 (30.55%, -18.29%)
    • Elizabeth Shenton (Lib Dem) 6,040 (14.55%, -4.03%)
    • Mike Nattrass (UKIP) 922 (2.22%)
    • Robert Smith (Green) 359 (0.87%)
    • David Roberts (Eng Dem) 275 (0.66%)
    • The Flying Brick (Monster Raving Loony) 236 (0.57%)
    • Mark Walklate (Ind) 217 (0.52%)
    • Paul Thorogood (Cut Tax on Diesel and Petrol) 118 (0.28%)
    • Gemma Garrett (Ind) 113 (0.27%)

    Well done to the team from the English Democrats and our candidate David Roberts, whose main objective was to expose the behaviour of Labour and the disgraceful anti English bias suffered by the English under the tenure of the Tartan Raj.

    Whilst The Conservatives have made no commitments to right the wrong of the English Democratic Deficit nor ensure that England is treated equally in terms of fiscal matters, they do recognise that they only receive their votes from England, so it is a salutory reminder to the Tories that they had better start putting England back on the map in terms of fairness and equality or their success will be shortlived too.

    Well done Crewe and Nantwich, you have sent an unmistakable message to the fools in Downing Street, they will be waking up with a terrific headache, one we might add they gave themselves.

    Labour.....on the way out at last!

     
    Crewe & Nantwich say goodbye to Labour

    Today the good people of Crewe & Nantwich will give their verdict on a decade of Labour.

    David Roberts the English Democrats Candidate has worked hard to put forward the views of the silent English majority, that Labour, Lib Dem and Tory parties have, for too long put England and the English at the back in terms of respect, priorities and treatment.

    English elderly deserve to be treated the same as the Welsh and Scottish elderly, if we are "one Union" as Gordon Brown keeps telling us why is it that ONLY the English seem to have to pay for everything, when others appear to get it for free or at a reduced cost?

    Why are English university students the only ones in the UK to have to pay £3,000 pa top up fees, Gordon Brown explain that?  If that isn't a blatant example of racism what is?

    Why are English Police Officers the only ones in the UK to get their pay settled in two stages, when the forces in Wales and Scotland receive it in one go?

    Why are English nurses the ones to suffer by not getting their pay rise either, when the nurses in Scotland and Wales have their pay settlement honoured in full?

    Why do English businesses pay such high business rates, when rates are much lower in Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland?

    Perhaps if Brown and Co spent less frittering hard won taxes away on Africa and pointless military conflicts we could actually pay our pensioners a decent living wage, but then again Labour have never been interested in sorting out the back yard before they started lording it on the world stage and giving away our taxes like confetti.

    There are many questions the English have not had answered, many questions which can only be answered by an English Parliament, with English MPs accountable to the English public.

    WHY should non English MPs have any say on English only matters?  Brown says it is right they do, but wrong that the English should have a say in Welsh and Scottish matters...what sort of logic is that???

    Today the good people of Crewe and Nantwich will cast their vote and we trust will do the right thing and get rid of Labour, a party full of SPIN and thinly disguised anti English racism, don't forget Labour are also led by a Scot who is a signatory to the Scottish Claim of Right and for those unsure of what it relates to, can we direct you to the Early Day Motion No. 266, which says all you need to know about the loyalties and interests of Gordon Brown and his Tartan mafia.

    The fact is unless you are Scottish Brown is not really interested in you, if you need proof of his duplicity  follow the link!

    http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=34373

     

     
    Bank of England keeping bank rescues quiet

    Well, nothing new there then!

    The Bank of England is yet another example of a government QUANGO that Labour is using to manipulate markets and hide financial incompetence on a grand scale.

    This worrying report demonstrates that Labour cannot be trusted with the country's finances.  Without transparency in financial affairs and with shady deals like Northern Rock continuing out of the public gaze the public should be very worried indeed at what is being done in their name.

    Labour can't be trusted to do right by the economy of finance industry.

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=440824&in_page_id=2&ct=5

     
    Labour abandons working people

    When Gordon Brown was shouted down by his own side when he tried to offer British jobs to British workers the writing was on the wall for Labour.

    Labour had abandoned the working classes, to them it was more important to fill jobs in the UK using cheap imported labour than to preserve the livelihoods and incomes of those who grappled to live in Labour's new world of dog eat dog capitalism.

    British workers have mortgages to pay, taxes to find, community charges to raise added to this the crippling prices of petrol at the pumps 80% of the cost being Gordon's stealth taxes, and spiralling energy costs  - is it any wonder the British are leaving our country in droves?

    If you are English you are treated worse than a third class citizen.  You will be sucked dry with taxation and if that isn't bad enough your pension will be pilfered by Labour, the company that ripped you off will get away scott free and when you are seething with anger Gordon and his pc brigade will tell you to be "tolerant".

    When the government you elect is more interested in frittering billions on the third world and funding failed states like South Africa you know you have problems.  When the government you elect ignores the suffering of its own elderly but spends billions prosecuting meaningless wars in countries that don't pose a threat to us it is time to call time.

    When the government you elect disrespects the families of the people of England to the point they feel they have to leave, we have a government that is toxic to our nation and toxic to our future.

    Labour has failed, Blair was a liability, Brown is a lash up, Labour have betrayed us all.

    Why should we have to leave to get democracy, free speech and respect - this is our home not a doormat for free healthcare, education and benefits.  Labour have failed us all.

    http://www.news-alliance.com/mass_exodus_of_britons.html

     
    Labour steals our privacy

    The failure of the Labour government to defend the democratic rights of the people of England against the disgusting creeping hand of the European Union makes Labour and their EU apologists the Liberal Democrats and the Tories totally responsible for what comes next.

    What does come next?  Well, you are about to see the full extent of the EU master plan, and if the EU take upon itself the right to record every email, every internet search and keep mobile phone information on behalf of every citizen you can be sure we can all be worried.

    It is one small step away from having the thought police clamp down on you.  Worried about the loss of free speech and democracy?  Find yourself trying to find other groups who are fearful we are turning into a new Communist Bloc, bingo, you might find yourself on a charge for sedition - just because you want to discuss it.

    Of course they will use "terrorism" as a convenient pretext by which to steal your privacy, of course if they were really concerned about terrorism they would have prevented such people from entering the EU in the first place, but instead dropped border control, if they really wanted them out of the EU they wouldn't be defending the use of the Human Rights Act to allow these scoundrels to walk freely in our society because EU law prevents us from locking them up OR sending them back.  It is all rubbish really, this is a naked assault on liberty, you had better believe it!

    This is no fantasy, it is a whole new terrifying reality.  The EU are getting closer and closer to having their hands around the neck of every freeborn citizen.

    Who voted to have them run all our affairs?  NO ONE - says it all really..................

    Now read the horrifying latest instalment in how Europe became enslaved to civil servants

    http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/telecoms/article3965033.ece

     
    Labour's Dirty Tricks Backfire

    You can't make it up!  So desperate is Gordon Brown to save his skin in Crewe and Nantwich that he is alleged to be behind a dirty tricks campaign to discredit other candidates standing.

    It is a sad state of affairs that politics in this country is conducted on such a playground level, and of course the stakes are high and getting higher, as all the "jobs for the boys" are at risk at Westminster if the public throws them all out at the next election.

    There is little loyalty to Labour, afterall what has Labour done for working people anywhere, let alone Crewe and Nantwich?

    A Primeminister that refuses to deliver English jobs for English people?  A Primeminister that has no power to lock up potential terrorists because he and his administration have given our right to self government away to Europe, without a vote and without the consent of the people!  A Primeminister who removed the 10p tax rate for lower earners, knowing the pain it would inflict and being forced to reinstate it has no money left in the Treasury to pay for it the cost of reinstatement has had to be borrowed.

    When you add to that anti English discrimination in everything from council taxes, top up fees for students, the denial of life saving drugs and the pitiful state of our elderly it is clear both Labour and Brown are a liability and must go.

    The Times Newspaper once an ardent defender of Labour is now backtracking like mad.....

      

    ‘Regime change’ in Labour?

    Senior Labour figures have warned that Gordon Brown could face a delegation of “men in suits” pressing him to resign if the party loses the pivotal Crewe by-election this week.

    With the campaign descending into accusations of dirty tricks, discontent with the prime minister’s leadership has begun to spread.

    “There has been a shift in mood,” said one MP. “Mutterings about regime change used to be confined to the fringes of the party, but now there is a more widespread view that Gordon will have to go unless he can win back public support.”

    Labour has been accused of deploying increasingly desperate tactics to hold on to Crewe and Nantwich in Cheshire. The party is defending a majority of 7,078 in Thursday’s vote.

    Yesterday Labour issued a new leaflet claiming that Tamsin Dunwoody, its candidate, had helped to persuade Alistair Darling, the chancellor, to change his mind over the 10p tax debacle. Contradicting ministers’ repeated claims that last week’s mini-budget had nothing to do with the by-election, the flyer states: “Tamsin delivers for Crewe and Nantwich. You told Tamsin your concerns. She put them directly to the chancellor. She stood up for you.”

    There have also been Labour attempts to smear Edward Timpson, the Conservative candidate, as a “friend of the paedophile” because he has occasionally defended sex offenders in his job as a barrister. “I think you will find he is not the type of lawyer he claims to be,” one Labour MP said.

    In further evidence of negative campaigning, Labour activists have been accused of telephoning Crewe voters in the middle of the night posing as Conservative canvassers. A Tory campaign source said: “It would not surprise us if Labour was stooping to this level. Its entire campaign has been marked by mean-spirited stunts and dirty tricks.”

    If Brown is forced to stand down before the next general election, James Purnell, 38, the work and pensions secretary, could emerge as frontrunner. His leadership campaign is likely to receive support from Stephen Carter, Brown’s most senior political adviser. “Carter tells anyone who will listen that James is the best thing since sliced bread,” a Labour source said.

    No 10 is braced for further personal attacks on the prime minister if Thursday’s vote goes against Labour. A senior party figure said: “One way of unseating him would be through a war of attrition, with relentless carefully placed attacks laying the ground for a delegation of elder statesmen – the ‘men in suits’.”

    Allies insist the prime minister’s resilience should not be underestimated. A leaked strategy document reveals the blueprint for the No 10 fightback.

    The paper, by David Muir, Downing Street’s director of political strategy, finds that private focus groups have compared David Cameron, the Tory leader, with an estate agent from Foxtons, the London firm famed for its aggressive sales technique. The polling suggests the public sees Cameron as energetic but believes there is “something about him that is not quite right”.

    “Asked what he would be in another life, it would be a salesman, car dealer, PR guy, estate agent and, worst of all, a Foxtons estate agent.”

    The document also says the government has lost its “licence to be heard” and needs “quick wins”. In an attempt to boost morale among despondent Labour activists, the document says there is “no great warmth” towards Cameron and the Tories, claiming that the opposition is “strategically brittle”.

    However, it counsels against class-based attacks – which Labour has used with its activists wearing top hat and tails in Crewe – saying the public is “very hostile” to this approach.

    Last night an ICM poll of Crewe & Nantwich voters put the Conservatives on 45%, eight points ahead of Labour on 37%.

    Observers in Crewe say a glamorous outsider candidate could win enough votes in the by-election to have a significant impact on the outcome. Gemma Garrett, otherwise known as Miss Great Britain and candidate for the Beauties for Britain party, is said to have become a focus for disaffected Labour voters.

    It emerged that Garrett has been given tips on how to run her campaign by Shaun Woodward, the Tory defector who is now Northern Ireland secretary.

    The pair met at the Ivy restaurant in London several days ago, after being introduced by friends.

     
    Labour's QUANGO Billions

    The people of Crewe and Nantwich have an opportunity on Thursday to say "NO" to Labour's waste in spending billions of taxpayers money on "non jobs" in hundreds of Quasi Non Governmental Organisations (QUANGOS)  which are chock full of Labour supporters all keen to use public money to further unpopular and meaningless Labour policies, which often discriminate against the taxpayers who are having to fund them.

    Today, the lid is blown off the scandal that is Labour's QUANGO'S, organisations which pretend not to be of government, but are funded by government or should we (accurately) say the taxpayer.

    The BBC another ghastly QUANGO well known for promoting a one sided neo liberal left wing view of the world is probably one of the more sinister organisations receiving billions from the public with little or no real accountability.  The hugely wasteful "Regional Assemblies" unwanted and rejected by public referendum are still sucking in huge amounts of public money, again unaccountable and unelected.

    If you add to that the OFWATS; OFGEMS; OFSTEDS and myriad of other ostensibly "independent" organisations evaluating everything from the standards of our education system to the price of power and competition in the marketplace a deeply worrying murky picture reveals itself.

    Labour have spent the last 10 years creating QUANGO UK, where billions of pounds are sectreted away to hundreds of pseudo government organisations, often filled with Labour party aparatchiks pulling the levers and being paid huge salaries for very little.

    Today the Taxpayers Alliance exposes the real truth and what a horror story they reveal:

     

    Quangos: The Unseen Government of the UK

     

    1,162 QUANGO'S PAID FOR BY THE HAPLESS TAXPAYER! 

    The TaxPayers’ Alliance (TPA) presents the full list of the UK’s vast quango industry, a detailed run-down of the staff and cost of the 1,162 bodies, boards and agencies that make up Britain’s Unseen Government. It is now five years since the Parliamentary Select Committee on Public Administration recommended that the Government publish such a list, a recommendation that the Government has failed to fulfil. In the absence of an official list, the TPA has compiled one instead, providing the public with the most comprehensive information available on the organisations that increasingly spend their money and influence their lives without democratic oversight. The report can be found here (PDF).

    Key Findings:

    • There are 1,162 quangos in the UK, running at a total cost to the taxpayer of £64 billion, equivalent to £2,550 per household.
    • Even under the Cabinet Office’s restrictive definition of quangos, the cost of these bodies has risen 50% in the last ten years.
    • UK quangos now employ an army of almost 700,000 bureaucrats.
    • Even the Government itself does not know the full extent of the unaccountable quango industry, which range from the massive e.g. Job Centre Plus (Staff: 70,042, Cost: £3.5 billion) and the Courts Service (Staff: 19,986, Cost: £704.8 million); to the bizarre e.g. the British Potato Council (Staff: 49); or the West Northants Development Corporation (Staff: 34, Cost: £15.3 million)
    • When the total number of quangos is added to the other government subsidiaries such as local authorities and NHS trusts, the total number of organisations controlled by the UK Government rises to 2,063, costing the taxpayer £257 billion and employing over 5.1 million people.

    Ben Farrugia, author of the report and Policy Analyst at the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said:

    “Government in the UK is now so large, diverse and complex that it is impossible for anyone to manage effectively, let alone by Ministers with no prior experience of management and little in-depth understanding of the work carried out by their departments. Government today tries to do too much, and consequently fails; the structure of government needs to change if we hope to see better value and significant improvements in our public services.”

    The full report provides a full list of the quangos along with individual data on staff numbers, taxpayer funding and expenditure as well as national totals and can be found here (PDF).

     
    TODAY IN CREWE & NANTWICH

    Today the English Democrats will be out in force at Crewe and Nantwich speaking to the good people of that English Constituency and telling them why a vote for Labour, Liberal Democrats and Tory is a wasted vote.

    Do we have a prescription for success?  Yes we do...

    End the anti English discrimination which pervades Westminster.

    STOP the disgusting £3,000 per annum top up fees ONLY inflicted on English students

    STOP denying life saving drugs to the people of England but permitting the Scots to have access to them        

    STOP handing extra funding to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland - the ENGLISH have needs too!               

    STOP discriminating against the elderly of England, they too should have free personal care                             

    STOP raising the costs of prescriptions to those living in England, they are free in Wales & £5.00 in Scotland! 

    STOP Insulting the English by denying us a right to debate devolution and a right to vote on it                            

    STOP allowing non English MPs to vote on English only matters, English MPs have no rights over Wales/Scotland!!

    STOP anti English discrimination, we are proud to be English and want a government who is on OUR SIDE      

    STOP the appalling standard of school meals and raise the amount spent to £1.00 the same as in Scotland      

    STOP TAKING THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND FOR A RIDE!

    The people of England make the Union financially possible, but the disgusting maltreatment of the very people who pay the costs of it are treated with a contempt which is quite astounding.

    Lib Dems will campaign for free prescriptions in Wales, but you won't hear them campaigning for free prescriptions in England, we wonder why?

    Labour will applaud its support of minority cultures, by liberatig Welshness, Irishness and Scottishness, but suggest that the English might also want cultural recognition also we are branded racists!  Similarly, it is regarded by Labour to be a triumph of democracy for Wales, Scotland and Ireland to have their own Parliament and Assembly, but should the people of England demand to have the same it is called "wreckless" and a "nonesense".  We all know the ones who are wreckless and a nonesense and they are the shower currently squatting in Downing Street.  With 22% of the popular vote, never before have we had such a rogue minority government.

    We say to the good people of Crewe and Nantwich Labour are losers, they are losers for the working people of England, losers in finance, losers in their respect for England, losers in destroying our society and losers in saddling our nation with debts of a staggering magnitude.  They lost our confidence years ago. 

    On Thursday do the right thing, send a message to Labour they won't be able to ignore.  They are finished, over and a new English dawn is rising.

     

    Good luck to everyone in Crewe and Nantwich - say goodbye to Labour

     
    Labour, - the New Nasty Party?